Judge lets Chrysler sever ties with 789 dealers, Supreme Court to let Fiat deal go forward

By Bree Fowler, Gaea News Network
Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Judge lets Chrysler cut 789 dealers immediately

NEW YORK — A bankruptcy judge on Tuesday approved Chrysler’s plan to terminate 789 of its dealer franchises, and the Supreme Court cleared the way for the automaker’s partnership with Italy’s Fiat, rejecting a plea by a trio of Indiana pension plans and others to block the sale.

U.S. Judge Arthur Gonzalez’s order says the franchises, which represent about 25 percent of the company’s dealer base, can no longer act as authorized Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep dealers, effective immediately. A written ruling explaining the decision was expected to be filed later.

The sale of Chrysler’s assets to Fiat Group SpA had been expected to close more than a week ago, but Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Monday decision to delay the sale while studying an appeal by three Indiana pension and construction funds threatened to derail Chrysler’s restructuring plans.

In a brief filed with the Supreme Court Tuesday afternoon, Chrysler and Fiat warned that the deal will terminate if it does not close by June 15. While a new agreement could be negotiated, there’s no guarantee that one will be reached or that Chrysler will be able to be jump-start its operations after the deadline, they said.

Late Tuesday, the Supreme Court cleared the way for Chrysler’s sale to Fiat, turning down a last-ditch bid by opponents. The court issued a brief, unsigned opinion explaining its action. To obtain a delay, or stay, someone must show that at least four of the nine justices find that the issue raised is serious enough to warrant hearing a full appeal and that a majority of the court will conclude the lower court decision was wrong.

“The applicants have not carried that burden,” the court said.

Earlier in the day, more than 25 attorneys representing hundreds of dealers from across the country argued in court that little would be gained by terminating the franchises, while Chrysler maintained that the move is a necessary part of its plan to cut costs and quickly emerge from Chapter 11.

Many of the dealers were trying to sell the last cars on their lots and preparing to shut their doors for good at the end of the day, while others planned to sell used cars or other brands after severing ties with Chrysler.

At Tuesday’s hearing, Chrysler attorneys also said the automaker would extend until Monday its program to help the affected dealers send any unsold vehicles to other dealers.

Auburn Hills, Mich.-based Chrysler flew through five weeks of bankruptcy proceedings and appeared all but certain to complete the sale of its assets to Fiat before the June 15 deadline. But Ginsburg issued a stay Monday to review an appeal by the Indiana funds that own a small part of Chrysler’s secured debt.

Fiat had the right to walk away from Chrysler after June 15 and leave the struggling U.S. automaker with little option but to liquidate. But a Fiat spokesman said Tuesday that the Italian automaker would not turn its back on a deal despite the Supreme Court stay.

Indiana officials, representing the state funds challenging the Chrysler sale, submitted a short statement to the Supreme Court Tuesday saying that based on Fiat’s statement there is no longer a reason to rush the court proceedings.

But Chrysler and Fiat said in court documents that the deal would terminate automatically if the sale doesn’t close by the deadline, and there was no guarantee that they could negotiate a new agreement.

“Given Chrysler’s precipitous state, every day past June 15 increases the risk that Chrysler’s business will not be able to restart successfully,” the company said.

The Obama administration warned in a separate filing that each day of delay consumes more of the financing provided by the government.

If the closing is delayed by more than 10 days, the government will need to “either to increase its overall funding to the detriment of taxpayers, or abandon its role in the transaction,” the administration said.

Production at Chrysler’s manufacturing plants remains halted pending the closing of the sale. Chrysler, which says it is losing $100 million every day its plants are closed, said it had no comment until it receives further information from the Supreme Court.

Chrysler’s ability to speed through the bankruptcy process has partially been a result of the involvement of the Obama administration’s auto task force, which provided $4.5 billion in financing and helped negotiate a deal with the company’s stakeholders.

Under the agreement brokered in the days leading up to Chrysler’s April 30 Chapter 11 filing, Fiat will receive up to a 35 percent stake in the automaker, in exchange for sharing the technology Chrysler needs to create smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

The United Auto Workers union will get a 55 percent stake that will be used to fund its retiree health care obligations, while the U.S. and Canadian governments will receive a combined 10 percent stake.

Meanwhile, the automaker’s secured debtholders would get $2 billion in cash, or about 29 cents on the dollar, for their combined $6.9 billion in debt. Some of the debtholders balked at the deal, saying as secured lenders they deserved more.

The Indiana funds filed an objection to the sale and later appealed to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court. They claim the sale unfairly favors Chrysler’s unsecured stakeholders such as the union ahead of secured debtholders like themselves.

The funds hold about $42.5 million, or less than 1 percent, of Chrysler’s $6.9 billion in secured debt. They bought it in 2008 for 43 cents on the dollar.

The funds also are challenging the constitutionality of the Treasury Department’s use of money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program to supply Chrysler’s bankruptcy protection financing. They say the government did so without congressional authority.

Consumer groups and individuals with product-related lawsuits also are contesting a condition of the Chrysler sale that would release the company from product liability claims related to vehicles it sold before the asset sale to Fiat.

Compensation for such claims would have to come from the parts of the company not being sold to Fiat. But those assets have limited value and it’s unlikely there will be anything to pay out.

The appeals come as Congress scrutinizes the Obama administration’s restructuring of Chrysler and GM. The Senate Banking Committee said it planned to call Ron Bloom, a senior adviser to the auto task force, and Edward Montgomery, who serves as the Obama administration’s director of recovery for auto communities and workers, to a hearing Wednesday.

Associated Press writers Mark Sherman and Ken Thomas in Washington, Colleen Barry in Milan and Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this report.

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :