House passes Homeland Security spending bill with money for border patrol agents, anti-piracy
By Andrew Taylor, APThursday, June 25, 2009
House passes $44B Homeland Security spending bill
WASHINGTON — The House passed a $44 billion spending bill Wednesday that awards the Homeland Security Department a 7 percent budget increase, with money for more border patrol agents and for anti-piracy efforts off the coast of Somalia.
As part of a GOP campaign against President Barack Obama’s order to close the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the bill requires the department to conduct threat assessments for the terrorist suspects being held there. It also requires that the department ensure that detainees are placed on its “no-fly” list and denied an array of immigration benefits, including admission into the United States and refugee status.
Those moves complement steps to block the release of Guantanamo detainees into the United States contained in a newly-enacted war-funding bill.
The House bill passed by a 389-37 vote. It came to the floor amid protests from Republicans, who said Democrats had taken unprecedented steps to close out lawmakers in both parties from being able to offer amendments freely, as is the long-standing custom of the House when debating appropriations bills.
For example, Rep. Harold Rogers of Kentucky, the top Republican on the Appropriations homeland security subcommittee, was frozen out of offering an amendment to end delays in requiring federal contractors to participate in the E-verify program, which uses the Social Security Administration database to root out people working in the U.S. illegally. The underlying bill extends E-verify for two years.
The homeland security measure is the third of 12 annual appropriations bills to pass the House as Democrats try to get the appropriations process back on track. It’s been years since the spending bills have passed as individual measures; instead, much-criticized multibill omnibus spending measures have become the norm.
To meet a deadline of passing the 12 bills through the House before the August recess, Democrats have clamped down on debate time. Just 14 amendments were able to be offered.
In their defense, Democrats said Republican conservatives were intent on disrupting the appropriations schedule, citing delaying tactics last week as Republicans protested their treatment. Republicans say House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, D-Wis., was too quick to seek curbs on GOP rights after debate had just started last week on a bill funding the Commerce and Justice departments.
Meanwhile, across the Capitol, a Senate panel approved its version of the Commerce and Justice bill, a $64.9 billion measure that also fully funds Obama’s request for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
That measure would cut nearly in half funding for a program that helps states with the cost of incarcerating criminal illegal immigrants, though it doesn’t eliminate the program as Obama has requested.
At issue is the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program, which would receive $228 million instead of the $400 million provided for the current budget year. House Democrats tried to cut the program back by $100 million, but retreated last week.
Democrats generally have paid little heed to Obama’s proposals to curb spending, announced with fanfare last month.
The House homeland security measure would fund more than 20,000 border patrol agents, about double the number employed before the 2001 terrorist attacks. It also provides $10 billion for the Coast Guard, including $242 million in funding for operations in the Persian Gulf and against pirates off the coast of Somalia.
The House measure also provides $1.1 billion to equip airports with explosives detection systems, almost double current funding.
Tags: Appropriations, Bill, Border Security, Government Programs, National Security, North America, Pirates, Political Organizations, Political Parties, United States, Us-congress-spending, Washington
|
June 25, 2009: 7:54 pm
Not identifying E-Verify as the perfect tool to extract illegal immigrants from the workplace, doesn’t wash with the American worker anymore? The once great US Chamber of Commerce, compliant with the ACLU, and other anti-sovereignty factions, have pushed our soft politicians to null E-Verify. Sen. Harry Reid(D-NV), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) have lost a great deal of public loyalty, because between them, they manufactured excuses to undermine any new law that enforced our weak immigration laws? Chief of Homeland Security is Napolitano who joined the other pathetic Senators, to stealthily direct ICE not to implement large immigration raids anymore. This has also been noticed by the public audience in the months since inheriting the office from Chertoff. By no means are these the legislators who are stating they are supporting E-Verify, or any other immigration law, but in actual fact voting against it. Their attitude shows up distinctly when they keep voting E-Verify being delayed for Federal contractors who of all people should be using it. It displays their complete apathetic when politicians allow 300.000 illegal workers, making use of Stimulus money in the construction industry. The 1986 Immigration Act has never been enforced, it has always been fully jeopardized and now the politicians want to replace it, by enacting another AMNESTY. Amendments to the 1986 Simpson/Mazzoli bill is all that’s required to add strength, to our border security and internal enforcement. Even any new health care for the American people is compromised by the illegal alien pestilence, because a great portion of the uninsured in our nation are these people heading in large numbers to emergency hospitals. In the decades since Europe saw the ingress of illegal immigrants into their countries, they have seen medical care sink in the quality of service, including rationing. Here in America health care has also been disparaged by added forced mandated laws, that illegal people must be attended to, for even the common cold–which becomes yet another financial impediment to the legal population. It’s just sheer madness on the part of the open border globalists, to keep feeding the country with millions of cheap labor. The burden for these services has never been financially appropriated from the businesses that employ foreign labor, but–ALWAYS–from the US taxpayer. We have been brain-washed by the media and government that there are only 11 million illegal people who have violated our laws, whoever this is far from the truth. We can not afford for another AMNESTY to succeed, and must fight back tooth and nail? It’s enactment would terrify the most conservative of financial analysts, of even larger obligation on every taxpayer. Of all the immigration tools at our disposal, we must not let our government exempt E-Verify from our ordinance. It should mandated in every human resources office that–ALL ERRORS– can be reconciled, after being hired at the Social Security agencies. President Obama has adamantly promised illegal aliens who knew the consequences of violating our border, a path to citizenship. Sorry! But the costs of this travesty cannot be even imagined. This is absolutely “Taxation without Representation” for like many laws that quietly fall upon the American taxpayer it is ethically wrong. Just addressing the OVERPOPULATION concept should be enough for–THE PEOPLE–to bombard your Senators and Congressman. Facts, statistics at NUMBERSUSA. |
Brittancus