FINRA fines Citigroup $600,000 over alleged trading strategies to pare taxes
By APMonday, October 12, 2009
FINRA fines Citigroup $600K over tax trading plans
WASHINGTON — Citigroup Inc. has agreed to pay a $600,000 fine and be censured to settle regulators’ charges that it failed to supervise complex stock-trading strategies aimed at reducing the bank’s potential tax bill.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the brokerage industry’s self-policing organization, on Monday announced the civil fine against the bank’s division Citigroup Global Markets Inc. Citigroup did not admit or deny FINRA’s allegations.
Citigroup failed to supervise and control trading, and to prevent improper internal trades as well as those with some of the bank’s trading partners, FINRA said. The transactions in question occurred between 2000 and 2005.
One of the strategies involved a Citigroup unit in New York buying stock from foreign brokerage customers. After some time had elapsed, during which the taxable dividends on the stock were paid out, the stock was sold back to the customers, FINRA said.
When dividends on U.S. company shares are paid to foreign investors, they may be subject to U.S. withholding taxes. Under the Citigroup arrangement, certain foreign customers were deemed to receive a “dividend equivalent” in a swap, not considered to be subject to withholding taxes.
FINRA said that in determining the amount of the fine, it took into account that Citigroup discovered the alleged violations and reported them to the regulators, and that the bank and a law firm it hired to make a review aided FINRA in its investigation.
“We are pleased to have this matter resolved,” said Jon Diat, a spokesman for Citigroup in New York.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. was fined $600,000 and censured for similar alleged violations in October 2008 by FINRA and the New York Stock Exchange.
Tags: Dividends, Government Regulations, Industry Regulation, New York, North America, United States, Washington
|
October 15, 2009: 1:11 pm
I am going through an absolute nightmare arbitration claim with FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. Paid for by the industry, for the industry. My hearing has been delayed time and time again. We had an arbitrator who had fraudulent degrees - a MA and PhD from a degree mill. I had to PUSH to get this guy off the panel– FINRA was going to let him stay as the chair — and to the best of my knowledge, he is still a FINRA arbitrator and chair! so, someone else could get him next… the respondent filed a retaliatory lawsuit against me - that was dismissed and he was sanctioned - but i spent tens of thousands of dollars fighting and wasted time with it. Check out my blog, myfinraclaim.com to read my story. and what is wrong with mandatory arbitration clauses. and FINRA - this is the only place for relief for investors and associated persons. and it is completely industry driven and run. it’s shameful… it’s time for congress to take over finra and have real regulation of the financial services industry… the commercials they are running? a joke. i haven’t been able to get a job in 19 months because of this - and they want me to wait another 4-6 months to get my day in court. Now the arbitrators have issued a gag/confidentiality order in violation of FINRA code and my first amendment right to free speech. |
Chris Wanken